 About the Schools and Libraries ProgramSchools and Libraries Tools |
Minutes for June 8, 2005 Service Provider Call
| A. |
MESSAGE FROM GEORGE MCDONALD, V.P., SLD
George McDonald has submitted his resignation as Vice President
of the Schools and Libraries Division of USAC effective June 30, 2005. “After
seven and a half years of working with USAC, I believe it is a good
time for the program to have fresh leadership with new ideas,” said
George McDonald to the USAC staff.
Commencing July 1, 2005, Mel Blackwell will be Acting Vice President
for the Schools and Libraries Division, as well as continuing his responsibilities
with USAC’s Rural Health Care Division.
George noted, “I have enjoyed my time at USAC and I look forward
to seeing all the programs that USAC administers succeed.”
For questions, please contact Tanya Sullivan, Senior Director Education
and Communications, USAC via E-Mail, 202-776-0200 |
|
|
| B. |
FUNDING COMMITMENTS
FY 2004
Wave 19, 5-24-05: $126.370 million
Wave 20, 6-07-05: $ 44.236 million
FY2003
Wave 40, 6-01-05: $ 59.056 million
Wave 40A, 6-08-05: $ .521 million
Please note that, in most cases, we have issued letters notifying service
providers and applicants of the status of the Form 471 applications that
have not yet received an FCDL for FY 2003 and was not included in the
Wave 40.
FY2002
Wave 30Q, 5-24-05: $ 3.090 million
|
| |
|
C. |
UPDATE TO FORM 471 STATUS TOOL
In order to provide more information to applicants and service providers
on the status of the review process for specific Forms 471, the SLD has
expanded the list of statuses available on the Form 471 Application Status
Tool and added a new feature. The basic functionality of the tool will
remain the same.
Please note that the status of each Form 471 will be available in real
time. This means that an application may move into and out of more than
one status during a given day, and may also move to an earlier status
during the course of a review. This movement is a part of the normal
review process, and this movement — including the temporary return
to an earlier status —should not be cause for concern.
Applications that are on hold because PIA could not reach the contact
person during the summer will show the status “Held for Contact
Person.” If the contact person returns, he or she can click on
this linked status and request a PIA contact to continue the application
review process. For more information on deadlines for providing information
during the summer and at other times, please refer to the document Deadline
for Information Requests posted in the Reference Area of this web site.
For more information on the application status tool or to view the status
of a Form 471, please go to the Form
471 Application Status Tool. |
| |
|
| D. |
MISCELLANEOUS UPDATES
An archive of Eligible Services Lists from previous years is available
through a link from the current Eligible Services List web page. These
lists are marked with an “Archive” watermark, and should not
be used for current eligibility issues.
A summary of the site visit report given by BearingPoint to the USAC Schools
and Libraries Committee in April 2005 is available from a link on all of
the pages in the Site Visits area of the web site.
A new document titled “Understanding Beneficiary Audits” is
available in the Reference Area of the web site. You can also access it
by choosing either of the “Audits” links under the gold menu
bars for Applicants and Service Providers in the left-hand column on the
web site. |
| |
|
| E. |
FORMS 472/473/474 UPDATE
This group of forms is still with the FCC and has not been sent to
the OMB for final approval. SLD is working internally on system changes
that may be required so as not to delay the posting of the revised forms
once OMB approval is obtained.
|
| |
|
| F. |
INVOICING UPDATE
SLD processed almost 32,000 invoice line items. This represents payments
to service providers in the amount of $157,115,404. The payments for
88% of these were within 30 days. 85% were made within 7 days. A total
of 2,465 items were over 120 days in process thus substantially reducing
the backlog of invoices to be reviewed.
The reviews are effective as it has been noted that 24% of the dollars
requested were denied for those items processed within 7 days, 42% were
denied for those items processed within 30 days and 21% were denied for
items processed taking over 120 days. We will continue to identify the
reasons for denial to assist in education efforts.
As of May 31 the dollars to be reviewed were down to $266M of which
only $88M were over 90 days in process. This compares to the $404M in
January of which $168M were over 90 days. It continues to be noted that
the contribution to the queue has stopped and the queue is being reduced.
Changes to the process and efficiencies gained had reduced the queue
and allowed us to sustain the incoming invoices. |
| |
|
| G. |
OTHER
Tanya Sullivan has recently joined USAC as Senior Director of
Education and Communications. SLD will be working with her to coordinate
a training
schedule for service providers and applicants for this upcoming funding
year. |
| |
|
H. |
GENERAL QUESTIONS RECEIVED BY E-MAIL
There were no questions available through e-mail. The following answers were provided for questions asked during the call.
| Q. |
What exact information should be included on an invoice issued
to a school on a monthly basis? Julia North, Charter Communications |
| R. |
SLD does not determine the billing systems for the large group
of service providers associated with this program. There are no requirements
placed on service providers by SLD regarding the internal billing
systems used to collect receipts. However, there are items found
on business billing systems that would assist in the timely review
of invoices. The customer bill would normally have a date, service
period covered, a description of goods/services being billed, a quantity,
unit cost and extended costs, a due date and any terms. The name
and address of the applicant being billed and the delivery location
for the goods being invoiced.
In the case of additional information that could provide provided
for this program’s assistance, discount percentage from the
FCDL being applied to the cost of goods/services, discounted amount
tying to the line on the Form 474.
This would provide SLD with much of the data requested during a
review of the invoice. The presence of this on the data submitted
to the review team will increase the efficiency of the review by
preventing the repeated attempts to solicit this information during
the review process. |
| |
|
| Q. |
My question is whether a Centrex-like service based on IP
driven platforms would be eligible for support as a telecommunication
service?
The IP-"Centrex" system would be connected to the PSTN
through trunk lines and would not be designed to by-pass the switched
network for purposes of toll by-pass or to provide voice over Internet.
In the 2005 Eligible Services List within the Telecommunications
section introductory block it states that, "IP-Enabled services
are the subject of an open proceeding at the FCC to determine, among
other things, whether certain types are telecommunications services." The
reference given primarily discusses voice over IP and other revolutionary
IP solutions.
The IP-"Centrex" system I am asking about does not fall
into the VoIP (toll by-pass) or revolutionary category. It would
provide the variety of features at the applicant's site via the local
distribution facilities (traditional phone line or Cat-5 depending
on handset) using packet switched hardware and software designed
instead of traditional circuit switched hardware and software. Steve
Walker, GSI |
| R. |
The SLD is able to fund digital transmission services. These
leased data circuits can be used for voice, video, and/or data. The
SLD is not able to fund services known as Voice or Video over IP.
The FCC has not provided specific guidance concerning services known
generally as "IP Centrex," so the statements in the previous
two sentences should be used by applicants and service providers
to determine the eligibility of specific service offerings. |
|
REMINDER: PLEASE E-MAIL YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE SERVICE PROVIDER CALL
TO THE CUSTOMER
SERVICE BUREAU BY COB ON
FRIDAY, JULY 83, 2005
. PLEASE REMEMBER TO WRITE,
“QUESTION FOR SERVICE PROVIDER CALL”
IN THE SUBJECT LINE SO THAT YOUR QUESTION IS ROUTED CORRECTLY. ALSO, PLEASE
WATCH THE SLD WEBSITE FOR ANY PROGRAM
UPDATES.
IF YOUR QUESTION IS RELATED TO INVOICING, PLEASE HIGHLIGHT THAT SUBQUESTION
SO THAT IT IS ROUTED DIRECTLY TO OUR INVOICING TEAM. ALSO, PLEASE WATCH THE
SLD WEBSITE FOR ANY PROGRAM
UPDATES.
Content Last Modified: June 9, 2005
|