 About the Schools and Libraries ProgramSchools and Libraries Tools |
Minutes for July 29, 2004 Service Provider Call
IMPORTANT NOTICE —THE TIME FOR NEXT CALL CHANGED TO 1:00 P.M. EDT ON
JULY 28, 2004
| A. |
FUNDING COMMITMENTS
A reminder that service providers can view
funding commitments online.
-
FY2002
FY2002 - No new commitments.
-
FY2003
FY2003 - Letters in Wave 31 were issued on June
16, 2004; commitments on this Wave totaled $28.3 million; Letters
in Wave 32 were issued on June 29, 2004, commitments in this Wave
totaled $32.2 million. Total commitments for FY2003 are now $2.615
billion.
- FY2004
FY2004 - Letters in Wave 4 were issued on June 8, 2004; commitments
on this Wave totaled $78.3 million. Letters in Wave 5 were issued on
June 22, 2004; commitments in this Wave totaled $92.6 million. Total
commitments for FY2004 are now $271.4 million.
|
| B. |
ELIGIBLE PRODUCTS DATABASE PILOT PROGRAM UPDATE
Enrollment by national manufacturers is proceeding, and SLD
expects to begin receiving data from enrolled manufacturers about their
eligible Internal Connections products on or about July 1.
|
| |
|
| C. |
ELIGIBLE
SERVICES UPDATE
SLD has submitted a draft Eligible Services
List to the FCC, for use in the next fund year cycle. The
FCC's plan is to issue a Public Notice with this draft List attached,
and to request public comment. After
reviewing the comments received, the FCC will issue a finalized List
in the fall of this year.
|
| |
|
| D. |
RENEGOTIATION
OR COST ALLOCATION OF CONTRACTS THAT CONTAIN MORE THAN BASIC MAINTENANCE
This is a notification that, as announced on the last service
provider call, June 9 was the deadline for applicants and service providers
with existing contracts that contain more than basic maintenance either
to renegotiate those contracts or to provide a cost allocation that
clearly identifies the portion of the cost of the contract price to
be allocated to basic maintenance
|
| |
|
| E. |
EARLY
FILERS OF FCC FORM 470 FOR FY2005
The guidance for early filers
of Form 470 for Funding Year 2005 has been updated since the last service
provider
call. In the updated
guidance, service providers are reminded that they can limit their
searches of posted Forms 470 to those posted on or after a certain
date.
|
| |
|
| F. |
INVOICING
UPDATE
| a. |
Payments in excess of $114,890k have been processed
in June. Lines processed were almost 25,000. Of these, 84% were
paid within 30 days and 92% were within 120 days. These
payments went to 1,350 SPINs.
|
| |
|
| b. |
Please note that June 30 is the end of Fund Year 2003.
Invoices for recurring services are due no later than 120 days
after the last date to receive services or 120 days after the Form
486 notification letter date, which ever is later. |
|
| |
|
| G. |
OTHER
SLD opened discussion on the RFP process to
gain a better understanding of the service providers' roles in that process.
|
| |
|
| H. |
GENERAL QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS RECEIVED BY E-MAIL-
Note: Questions are submitted as received and not edited for content
or grammar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q.
|
Does a service provider would need to enroll as a manufacturer -
correct, this is quite confusing to me, and I'm hoping someone can
clear this up - normally wireless providers don't manufacturer anything,
so I'm thinking no; this would be geared more towards internal and
internet connections. Christina Halley, Nextel
|
|
R.
|
Only national manufacturers may enroll in the pilot.
|
|
Q.
|
I'm puzzled about the discussion regarding reposting 470's, if a
customer changes rate plans within a funding year; large service
providers have centralized customer services, and normally try not
to put limitations on authorized customer change request. Most provides
have an automated system that separates eligible charges vs. non
eligible within an automated matter; I'm really puzzled, if you provide
month-to-month services, why would this be necessary? Most Large
providers supply applicants/customers with quarterly reporting, total
eligible charges, dates of auto discounting or 472 - bears processed
and posted, date USAC was billed and the amount billed and paid against
their FRN, etc. and if applicants/customers aren't utilizing all
their funding advise them to file form 500's. I just don't know how
this would impact the applicants, if provider's limited changes for
a customer based on Erate Status? Please help me here. Christina
Halley, Nextel
|
|
R.
|
If an applicant wants to change a service during the funding year,
they cannot post a new Form 470. If this is a month-to-month service
and the customer is seeking a higher rate plan, than the customer
must absorb the difference if it is greater than the amount originally
approved for funding. If the customer is seeking a lower rate plan,
then the customer would file a Form 500 and request an adjustment
to the funding commitment.
|
|
Q.
|
Often it is taking 30+ days before we are initially contacted to
send Service Certification forms and copies of invoices. Can we send
this information ahead of time? This seems to be slowing the process
and we still are having most invoices paid at 60+ days after submittal.
Amanda Hyland, CDW Computer Centers
|
|
R.
|
No. The documentation will be requested if needed. You may have
prepared documentation ready for submission upon request but SLD
does not have the facility to accommodate pre-requested submissions.
|
|
Q.
|
If an applicant changes their monthly price plan from the amount
specified in the current funding request and a new service contract
is required per the business rules of the service provider, does
a new or revised Form 470 allowing for a new 28 day bid window have
to be filled? If so, do they have to file for the current and upcoming
window as well? Christy Haywood, Nextel Partners
|
|
R.
|
To Be Revised and Discussed On Next Service Provider Call
|
|
Q.
|
If a new service contract is not required, but the price of the
plans will change, do they need to refile? Only if the changes are
for a specified dollar amount? Christy Haywood, Nextel Partners
|
|
R.
|
To Be Revised and Discussed On Next Service Provider Call
|
|
Q.
|
If the service contract will change and extend into the next funding
yea, should the applicant revise the new application to show a multi-year
contract? Christy Haywood, Nextel Partners
|
|
R.
|
To Be Revised and Discussed On Next Service Provider Call
|
|
REMINDER: PLEASE E-MAIL YOUR QUESTIONS FOR THE SERVICE PROVIDER CALL TO
THE CUSTOMER
SERVICE BUREAU BY COB ON FRIDAY JULY 23, 2004. PLEASE
REMEMBER TO WRITE, "QUESTION FOR SERVICE PROVIDER CALL" IN THE SUBJECT LINE
SO THAT YOUR QUESTION IS ROUTED CORRECTLY.
IF YOUR QUESTION IS RELATED TO INVOICING, PLEASE HIGHLIGHT THAT SUBQUESTION
SO THAT IT IS ROUTED DIRECTLY TO OUR INVOICING TEAM. ALSO, PLEASE WATCH
THE SLD WEBSITE FOR ANY PROGRAM UPDATES.
Content Last Modified: July 19, 2004
|