Minutes from the Wednesday Service Provider Conference Call
March 13, 2002
UPDATES
Year 5
The demand estimate for Year 5 is $5.73 billion. SLD is confident it will meet
the Priority One demand, which is approximately $1.8 billion. Currently the
rough estimate for Priority Two (Internal Connections) demand just at the 90%
level is $2.6 billion. From those numbers it appears that the Priority Two requests
at 90% will have to be prorated. To be sure we know just what is being asked
for, SLD will be asking applicants to "true up" their requests and make reductions
if possible. There will be more on this in coming weeks.
SLD wants to get commitments out as soon as possible, and on a regular schedule
(such as the every-other-week schedule used for funding Waves for Year 4). In
order to be sure that we have the best information about demand for Priority
Two at the 90% level, SLD will probably limit commitments in the first Wave
just to those applications that had FRNs for Priority One services.
Year 4 - Wave 15
Wave 15 will be made public on March 18. There will be some additional activity
after this Wave.
PASSING LINE ITEMS ON BEARS
Service Provider Invoice Forms (SPIs) are processed on a line item basis; each
FRN is considered a separate line and each line passes or fails or requires
review separately. Currently, BEARs are processed as a whole form; if one item
does not get approved, it holds up the processing of the entire BEAR. On the
plus side, the Service Provider receives payment for the entire BEAR amount,
and the Service Provider and Applicant know that the BEAR is paid.
SLD is considering a move to passing line items on BEARs. This would result
in faster response in BEAR processing and cut down on problem resolution. However,
checks would only be issued for those line items passed. This would mean more
BEAR approval letters and potentially multiple checks relating back to a single
BEAR.
SLD is looking for feedback from the Service Provider community on the pros
and cons of adopting a line item approach. Please send emails to the serviceprovider
address.
FORM 471 ITEM 21 ATTACHMENTS
SLD now accepts Item 21 attachments by email and fax. Please see Guidelines
for Submitting Form 471 Line 21 Attachments by Email or Fax, found under
SLD's What's New on the website.
NEW FACES
Mick Kraft is the new Manager for Invoicing Issues. Mick will oversee invoicing
operations and be SLD's liaison on invoicing issues.
Ed Falkowitz will be moving to DC and will become the Manager for Audit Responses.
Karen Haith will be the new Invoice Manager at NECA and will be the day-to-day
manager of invoice operations. NECA is USAC's contractor responsible for invoice
processing.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Q What is the purpose of the "filler" SPIN? I thought it was when a Service
Provider hadn't received their SPIN yet and could use this "filler" SPIN temporarily.
A customer recently mentioned that they hadn't selected their vendor and would
be using a "fake" SPIN until FCDLs came out and could then develop a competitive
RFP if funding was granted. Is this legal?
A This is NOT legal. SLD looks very carefully at Applicants using interim SPINs
and if there is no legally binding arrangement the Applicant could be subject
to FCC action.
There are two "interim" SPINs: If an Applicant has a legally binding contract
with a Service Provider, but the Service Provider does not have a SPIN yet,
the applicant who filed electronically was allowed to use 143666666 as the SPIN
in order to complete the application on line. (Paper filers could just put in
the name of the Service Provider and leave the SPIN line blank.) Where a state
master contract is due to expire during a funding year or prior to the start
of the funding year, the applicant can use 143999999 as a "place holder" for
the eventual Service Provider who is awarded the replacement contract.
Q Are true IP handsets with Internet capability "eligible" in any way?
A They are NOT eligible. USAC does not pay for end user equipment, regardless
of their functionaltiy; therefore, the handsets are not eligible for discount.
Q Can a definitive date be given for when appeals for Year 2 and 3 will be
released?
A At this point there is no information available for the next run of appeals
commitments.
Q Will unspent Year 3 funds become available for Year 5?
A This will take FCC action and that action will be informed by the comments
the FCC receives on the NPRM.
Q How would Year 5 Priority Two funds be prorated?
A For Priority Two at 90%, the funds that are committed are a percentage of
the funds requested, based on how much funding remains available. For example,
if there is only $250,000 available, and the total requests are for $1,000,000,
SLD will commit 25% of the request. That means the request is multiplied by
25%; if the Applicant requested $40,000, they would receive $10,000 as a commitment.
Q What happens to Applicants that are not in Wave 15?
A If an Applicant has yet to be funded, that Applicant will receive a letter
from SLD saying that they have not been forgotten and that their application
is still being processed.
Q Is there a database to check the status of a current FRN?
A Not yet, but SLD is working toward this goal.
Q Does the presence of a grant become a factor in evaluating whether there's
a fair competition?
A Applicants must have the resources necessary, and if access to a grant is
seen as an inducement for the Applicant to choose a particular vendor, there
could be a problem in the competitive process.
Q A customer has filed their Form 471. Can the customer do a SPIN change if
the Service Provider is the same but the SPIN is incorrect?
A This would be a SPIN correction, and may be filed any time during the funding
year.
Q Are Service Certifications sent to each Service Provider, or are they randomly
sent?
A While not sent to everyone, Service Certifications are used as an audit mechanism
in reviewing invoices.
Q Should one person only be designated to sign off on a BEAR?
A This would depend on the practices of the Service Provider company; SLD has
no specific requirements on this.
Content Last Modified: May 1, 2003
|