| Rural Health Care Update
August 2007
IMPORTANT NOTE:
There will be no monthly conference call in August.
The Rural Health Care Program hosts a monthly outreach conference call for applicants and service providers on the second Thursday of each month at 2 P.M., EST. The monthly conference call will resume September 13.
Funding Year Statistics
Funding years in the Rural Health Care Program run from July 1 of one year to June 30 of the next year. For example, Funding Year 2007 runs from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008. Below are some statistics for applications received and processed by USAC for Funding Years 2004-2007.
In addition, the FCC’s Rural Health Care Pilot Program received 81 applications representing almost 7,000 health care providers from 42 states and territories. Applicants requested over $300 million for the first year of the pilot program. The pilot program is capped at $100 million for two years. USAC is currently awaiting FCC decisions regarding which applications will be supported.
Packet Status Update by Funding Year
The table below provides the number of forms received by USAC for FY2004 through FY2007. Note that FY2007 data is current as of June 30, 2007. The second part of the table provides figures for USAC’s processing of Forms 466 and 466-A. USAC reviews the form(s) and supporting documentation, collectively known as a "packet," for accuracy.
During the processing of Form 466, the term packet is used to define the processing unit of a telecommunications circuit. On lines 21-38 of Form 466, connection information is required for each segment of a multi-billed circuit. Each segment is processed individually and a packet is created for each segment. In the case of a circuit where there is only one service provider for the entire circuit, a single packet is created. A Form 466 may contain up to four packets. Each packet must have supporting documentation in the form of a service provider’s bill and/or contract for service. For Form 466-A, the term packet refers only to the application and its supporting documentation.
| Forms Received
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007*
|
| Form 465
|
2,999
|
3,481
|
3,390
|
2,710
|
| Form 466
|
3,859
|
4,351
|
4,648
|
216
|
Form 466-A
|
810
|
1,144
|
1,032
|
105
|
*FY2007 data as of June 30, 2007.
| Form 466 and 466-A Packet Status
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007*
|
Approved
|
4,203
|
4,813
|
2,859
|
0
|
| Denied**
|
134
|
133
|
15
|
0
|
| Duplicate Packet
|
68
|
56
|
8
|
0
|
| Withdrawn
|
332
|
537
|
320
|
0
|
| Requires Documentation
|
0
|
0
|
1,797
|
321
|
| In Process by USAC
|
0
|
12
|
813
|
0
|
| Total Reviewed
|
4,737
|
5,551
|
5,812
|
321
|
**Includes incomplete applications, ineligible vendor or service, or program rule violations.
Funding Year 2007
The Funding Year 2007 application window opened March 12, 2007. About 85% of the Form 465s submitted so far were electronically certified.
Funding Year 2006
The Funding Year 2006 application window opened on March 13, 2006 and closed on June 30, 2007, with 75% of the Form 465s electronically certified. As of June 30, 2007, USAC has committed $27.49 million in support for Funding Year 2006.
Funding Year 2005
The Funding Year 2005 application window opened on April 18, 2005 and closed on June 30, 2006, with over 65% e-certified. As of June 30, 2007, USAC has committed $41.74 million in support for Funding Year 2005.
Funding Year 2004
The Funding Year 2004 application window opened March 29, 2004 and closed June 30, 2005, with over 70% of Form 465s e-certified. USAC committed $35.58 million in support for Funding Year 2004.
Understanding "Evergreen Status" for Contracts
Many applicants to the Rural Health Care Program have contracts with a service provider to obtain the services they need to provide telemedicine. For an applicant to be considered under contract in the program, the contract:
- must identify both parties to the contract,
- must be signed and dated by both parties,
- must specify the type and terms of service,
- must have a specific duration, and
- must be reviewed and verified as to these details by USAC.
Applicants that submit contracts meeting these requirements will be considered to have "evergreen status" meaning that for the life of the contract (without any optional extension), they need not re-compete the service or post the Description of Services Requested and Certification Form (Form 465), and may annually apply for support of the contracted service by filing a Funding Request and Certification Form (Form 466) or Internet Service Funding Request and Certification Form (Form 466-A). USAC reviews all submitted contracts, determines if evergreen status applies, and logs the contract end date.
A health care provider that submits a contract that does not meet evergreen requirements is treated as having a month-to-month, tariffed service and may not receive support prior to selection of the most cost-effective service after the required 28-day posting of Form 465 each Funding Year. Support for a month-to-month service cannot start before this selection and the cost of a service termination should not be a consideration in determining the most cost-effective service.
The contract status of an applicant is indicated in the applicant's Funding Commitment Letter, which shows "contract" for applicants with evergreen contract status or "tariff" for applicants not considered to be under contract.
Applicants with evergreen contracts need not post Form 465 during the life of that contract, but must post a Form 465 to add service, make cardinal changes, renew, or extend the contract (including optional extensions).
Applicants whose contracts have evergreen status are reminded to post Form 465 and re-compete and select a service provider before the life of the contract ends. An optional contract renewal counts as a new contract and must be selected through posting Form 465. Evergreen contract applicants that post a Form 465 should advise any bidders of their contract end date and whether it is after the end of the Funding Year. The contract end date also should be indicated on their new Form 465.
USAC Site Visits Well Under Way
Rural Health Care Program site visits began in April and include outreach, education, and compliance components. As of June 15, 2007, 30 of the 50 site visits have been completed.
Applicants participating in Rural Health Care site visits are provided with outreach focused on the available resources on USAC’s website. The tour of the USAC website includes demonstrations of the various search tools, including searching commitments
of Rural Health Care support, how to search for eligible rural areas,
and finding the urban rates.
Additionally, the USAC website tour covers an overview of the application process,
addresses the glossary
of Rural Health Care terms, and informs applicants of the monthly outreach conference calls.
These visits have identified some trends among applicants.
- Many Health Care Providers (HCPs) report they have used Rural Health Care support to upgrade their data circuits in order to transmit online Electronic Medical Records between facilities and to develop Picture Archiving and Communications Systems to view online teleradiology films.
- HCPs visited report that without Rural Health Care support, the HCPs would still be required to provide the same level of technology to their facilities but at the detriment of patient services. More specifically, HCPs have stated that jobs would be lost, the cost of patient services would increase, and physician resources would be limited.
- One of the 30 HCPs visited reported that it used consultant services to assist with the Rural Health Care program’s application process. Eighty-five percent of HCPs visited rated the ease of the application process as moderate, moderately easy, or easy, and 84% state that the instructions on the application forms are clear and easy to follow.
In the second quarter of 2007, USAC visited six HCPs in Fairbanks, Dillingham, Kodiak, and Ketchikan in Alaska. A representative from one of the health care facilities indicated that the distance separating remote villages in Alaska from the nearest major medical center can cause HCPs to incur extremely high travel and transportation costs to provide appropriate patient care in the absence of telehealth.
The HCP representative also stated that the facility would also be unable to provide teleradiology services and would have to send X-rays to radiologists via the U.S. Postal Service, which would mean that “reading” an X-ray would take days or weeks, rather than hours, and would affect the level of care the facility is currently able to provide to its patients.
Visit the Rural Health Care Program site visit
page for more information.
Frequently Asked Questions about Services Eligible for Discount
Q. What services may be discounted for eligible HCPs?
A.
Internet access charges and any telecommunications service that is used for the provision of health care. These telecommunications services include, but are not limited to:
• Mileage Related Charges • T3 or DS3 • T1 • Fractional T1 • Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN-Basic Rate Interface (BRI) and Primary Rate Interface (PRI) services) • Frame Relay • ATM • Off-Premise Extension • Satellite Service • Centrex • Dedicated Private Line • Foreign Exchange Line • Network Reconfiguration Service • Direct Inward Dialing • Onetime (Installation) Charges
Usage and toll charges are not eligible for support. Special construction and maintenance charges are not eligible for support. Franchises, zone charges, and surcharges also are not eligible for support. Taxes, as a percentage of the cost paid on a telecommunications service, are eligible for support.
Q. Are onetime or installation charges covered for eligible HCPs?
A.
Yes, for telecommunications services. If there is a difference between the charges for the same or similar services in the rural vs. the urban location and the rural is more costly, the difference is supported. For Internet access installation charges, the support is 25% of the cost of installation.
Q. What is meant by limited distance-based charges? A.
Support is available for applicable distance-based charges (minus the Standard Urban Distance) for the distance between the rural HCP and the farthest point on the jurisdictional boundary of the largest city in the HCP’s state. If an eligible rural HCP chooses to connect to a point beyond this Maximum Allowable Distance (MAD), it must pay the appropriate unsupported rate for any distance-based charges incurred beyond the MAD. There is no requirement, however, that the HCP choose service that connects to the largest city. The support that would have been available to the largest city may be applied to a service that connects to any other area, including in another state. Support is not available for long-distance per minute toll charges.
Q. Is there a maximum bandwidth for eligible telecommunications services?
A.
No. The FCC’s Fifteenth Order on Reconsideration (FCC 99-269,
released 11/1/1999) eliminated the previous 1.544 Mbps (T-1) bandwidth limit for supportable services, starting 7/1/2000.
Q. What Internet support is available?
A.
For Internet access services, the USF will support 25% of the charges billed to the HCP. Use Form 466-A for this application. Any (urban or rural) HCP that does not have toll-free access to the Internet also can receive telecommunications services support: the lesser of $180 in toll charges per month or the toll charges incurred for 30 hours of access to the Internet per month.
Q. What if an eligible HCP requests a service that is not offered in its local area or that could not be supported by the infrastructure or facilities currently in place? Is universal service support available for infrastructure development?
A.
Universal service cannot support infrastructure development. In the FCC’s Report and Order on Universal Service (FCC 97-157,
released 5/8/1997), the FCC stated that it had insufficient information to determine the level of need for infrastructure development or to estimate reliably the costs of supporting it. There also was insufficient information regarding existing federal and state programs already supporting infrastructure development and the extent to which such programs are meeting current needs, it said.
Q. Is there a limit to the number of services for which an HCP may receive support?
A.
No. An eligible rural HCP may receive support for as many services as it can use for the provision of health care.
Q. Can connections between two rural sites be supported?
A.
Yes. Subject to the distance limitations discussed concerning the largest city in the HCP’s state, an eligible rural HCP may elect to use a supported connection to link to a site in a rural area.
|